Comparative Study of Social Science Developments in the Period of Totalitarism (Experience of Germany, the Soviet Union and China)

Volume 14, Issue 1
September 2023
Pages 1-48

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences Education

2 Associate Professor of Theoretical-Cultural Sociology

Abstract
Totalitarian regimes have their own characteristics that reproduce them as much as possible in other fields, especially science and academia. Studying the challenge between the social sciences and totalitarian rule can be instrumental in the development of social science. The purpose of this study is to make a comparative-historical comparison of this relationship at a time of totalitarian rule in Germany, the Soviet Union and China. The study method is comparative-historical and the reported experiences in three cases of Nazi Germany, Soviet Union and Communist China have been compared historically. Data were collected from second-hand sources and analyzes were presented in a comparative-historical manner. The findings show some similarities and differences between Nazi and communist totalitarianism. Nazi totalitarianism had an a-priori negative mentality towards social science and avoided any institutionalization and by creating an obstruction against the activities of scientists, provided the ground for the migration of social thought, while communist totalitarianism had an a-priori positive mentality towards social science and tried to institutionalize and attract scientists in this field to produce favorable social science. Both forms of totalitarianism, at the height of their tyranny, sought a government-dependent, non-critical, quantitative, practical, and useful social science to perpetuate power.

Keywords

Subjects
احمدی، حسین؛ و کسرایی، محمدسالار (1399) نقش دین در انقلاب فرهنگی (مطالعه تطبیقی جایگاه دین در انقلاب فرهنگی ایران، چین و روسیه از دیدگاه جامعه‌شناسی تاریخی)، جامعه‌شناسی تاریخی، 12(2): 37-58.
اسکاچپول، تدا؛ تریمبرگر، الن کای. (1385) یک تحلیل ساختاری از انقلاب‌ها، در گلدستون، جک، مطالعاتی نظری، تطبیقی و تاریخی در باب انقلاب‌ها، ترجمه محمدتقی دلفروز، تهران: انتشارات کویر.
بلوم، استوارت (1370) جامعه‌شناسی علوم و جامعه‌شناسی‌های علم، در توکل، محمد (1370) جامعه‌شناسی علم، تهران، انتشارات نص.
روشه، گی (1372) تغییرات اجتماعی، ترجمه منصور وثوقی، چاپ چهارم، تهران: نشر نی.
سلدن، مارک (1385) انقلاب کمونیستی چین، در گلدستون، جک، مطالعاتی نظری، تطبیقی و تاریخی در باب انقلاب‌ها، ترجمه محمدتقی دلفروز، تهران: انتشارات کویر.
ساعی، علی(1386) روش تحقیق در علوم اجتماعی (با رهیافت عقلانیت انتقادی)، تهران: سمت.
کابررا، میگوئل اِ. (1399) جامعه؛ یک شجره شناسی تاریخی، ترجمه حسین احمدی، تهران: اندیشه احسان.
کوزر، لیوئیس (1372) زندگی و اندیشه بزرگان جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمه محسن ثلاثی، چاپ چهارم، تهران: انتشارات علمی.
هیوز، استیوارت (1378) هجرت اندیشه اجتماعی، ترجمه عزت‌الله فولادوند، چاپ دوم، تهران: طرح نو.
Abel, T. (1951). The Sociology of Concentration Camps. Social Forces, 30(2), 150–155. doi:10.2307/2571626
Abramov, R. (2016). Understanding Professionalism in the Soviet :union: and Post-Soviet Russia: an Analytical Review. The American Sociologist, 47(1), 81-101.
Arkush, R. D. (1981). Fei Xiaotong and sociology in revolutionary China (No. 98). Harvard University, Asia Center.
Aronova, E. (2011). The politics and contexts of Soviet science studies (Naukovedenie): Soviet philosophy of science at the crossroads. Studies in East European Thought, 63(3), 175-202.
Aronova, E. (2012). Studies of Science Before “Science Studies”: Cold War and the Politics of Science in the US, UK, and USSR, 1950s–1970s. University of California, San Diego.
Baehr, P. (2002). Identifying the unprecedented: Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology. American Sociological Review, 804-831.
Barbalet, J. (2013). Teaching classical sociological theory in Hong Kong SAR, China. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 426-440.
Beliaev, E., & Butorin, P. (1982). The institutionalization of Soviet sociology: Its social and political context. Social Forces, 61(2), 418-435.
Ben-David, J. (1972) The Scientist`s Role in Society, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
Bentwich, N. (2012). The rescue and achievement of refugee scholars: The story of displaced scholars and scientists 1933–1952 (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.
Castellin, L. G., & Rösch, F. (2021). Weimar in America: Central European Émigrés, Classical Realism, or How to Prevent History from Repeating Itself. In Realism (pp. 45-62). Palgrave Pivot, Cham.
Chernenko, K. 1983. The problem of the en-tire Party, the duty of every communist. Pravda June 15th (Kommunist 15/26).
Desan, M. H. (2016). "Order, Authority, Nation": Neo-Socialism and the Fascist Destiny of an Anti-Fascist Discourse (Doctoral dissertation).
Freedman, M. (1962). Sociology in China: A Brief Survey. The China Quarterly, (10), 166-173.
Greenfeld, L. (1988). Soviet sociology and sociology in the Soviet :union:. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1): 99-123.
Hsi-En-Chen, T. (1959). The thought reform of intellectuals. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 321(1), 82-89.
King, A. (2007). The sociology of sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(4), 501-524.
Krohn, C. D. (2000). American Foundations and Refugee scholars between the Two Wars. In G. Gemelli (Ed.), The “Unacceptables”: American Foundations and Refugee Scholars between the Two Wars and After (pp. 35-50). Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang. Wiese, 1948.
Krohn, C. D., & Vidich, A. J. (1993). Intellectuals in exile: Refugee scholars and the New School for Social Research. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Lifton, R. J. (1956). Thought reform of Chinese intellectuals: A psychiatric evaluation. The Journal of Asian Studies, 16(1), 75-88.
Lunn, E. (1975). European Social Thought in the Twentieth Century. The Massachusetts Review, 16(1), 98-108.
Mucha, J. & Krzyzowski, Ł. (2014). No longer between East and West: Dialectics and paradoxes in Polish sociology. In Routledge Handbook of European Sociology (pp. 423-441). Routledge.
Ramanayake, U. B. (1988). An Historical Overview of Soviet Sociology. Vidyodaya Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2 (1-2): 1-19.
Ratner-Rosenhagen, J. (2019). The Ideas that Made America: A Brief History. Oxford University Press.
Reiss Jr, A. J. (1967). Sociology. Published in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (1968), 15: 1-23. Available at: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/50807/22.pdf?sequence=1.
Ritter, G. A. (2010). German Refugee Historians and Friedrich Meinecke: Letters and Documents, 1910-1977. Brill.
Sackmann, R. (2016). Democracy, Totalitarianism, and Dead Ends in Sociology. Serendipities, 2: 158-177.
Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. (2007). The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS): shaping the reforms, academia and China (1977-2003). Brill.
Sokolov, M. (2009). Russian Sociology after 1991: The Institutional and Intellectual Dynamics of a “Poor” Discipline. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research, 1(1), 58-64.
Sokolov, M. M. (2014, July). Famous and Forgotten; Types of Social Secrecy under Totalitarianism and the Intellectual Style of Soviet Sociology. Paper presented at the XVIII ISA World Congress of sociology, Yokohama, Japan.
Sorokin, P. (2015). The Russian sociological tradition from the XIXth century until the present: Key features and possible value for current discussions. The American Sociologist, 46(3), 341-355.
Steinmetz, G. (2010). Ideas in exile: refugees from Nazi Germany and the failure to transplant historical sociology into the United States. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 23(1), 1-27.
Steinmetz, G. (2017). Field theory and interdisciplinarity: History and sociology in Germany and France during the twentieth century. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 59(2), 477-514.
Szollosi-Janze, M. (2001). Science in the Third Reich. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Timasheff, N. S. (1946). The great retreat: The growth and decline of communism in Russia. New York: EP Dutton.
Wagner, P. (2014). Europe and the sociology of modernity. ed. Sokratis Koniordos and Alexandros Kyrtsis, Routledge Handbook of European Sociology(pp: 127-140), Routledge.
Weber, Eugen (1962) “Nationalism, Socialism, and National-Socialism in France” French Historical Studies Vol. 2 No. 3 pp. 273-307.
Wong, S. L. (2013). Sociology and socialism in contemporary China. Routledge.
Yahuda, M. B. (Ed.). (1987). New Directions in the Social Sciences and Humanities in China. Macmillan Press.
Zhaofa, H. (1987) The Re-establishment of Sociology Discipline in China, 154-159 in: Yahuda, M. B. (eds.) New Directions in the Social Sciences and Humanities in China, Macmillan Press.
Zhou, M. (Ed.). (2017). Contemporary Chinese Diasporas. Springer.