Volume 14, Issue 1 (2022)
JHS 2022, 14(1): 1-48 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ahmadi H, Kasraei M S. Comparative Study of Social Science Developments in the Period of Totalitarism (Experience of Germany, the Soviet Union and China). JHS 2022; 14 (1) :1-48
URL: http://jhs.modares.ac.ir/article-25-55463-en.html
URL: http://jhs.modares.ac.ir/article-25-55463-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences Education , hahmadi6@gmail.com
2- Associate Professor of Theoretical-Cultural Sociology
2- Associate Professor of Theoretical-Cultural Sociology
Abstract: (1738 Views)
Totalitarian regimes have their own characteristics that reproduce them as much as possible in other fields, especially science and academia. Studying the challenge between the social sciences and totalitarian rule can be instrumental in the development of social science. The purpose of this study is to make a comparative-historical comparison of this relationship at a time of totalitarian rule in Germany, the Soviet Union and China. The study method is comparative-historical and the reported experiences in three cases of Nazi Germany, Soviet Union and Communist China have been compared historically. Data were collected from second-hand sources and analyzes were presented in a comparative-historical manner. The findings show some similarities and differences between Nazi and communist totalitarianism. Nazi totalitarianism had an a-priori negative mentality towards social science and avoided any institutionalization and by creating an obstruction against the activities of scientists, provided the ground for the migration of social thought, while communist totalitarianism had an a-priori positive mentality towards social science and tried to institutionalize and attract scientists in this field to produce favorable social science. Both forms of totalitarianism, at the height of their tyranny, sought a government-dependent, non-critical, quantitative, practical, and useful social science to perpetuate power.
Keywords: Sociology of Sociology, Totalitarianism, Emigration of Social Thought, Soviet Union, China, Nazi Germany.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |