Analysis of Production Organization and Standardization in a Prehistoric Society: An Approach to Ceramic Decoration of Tal-e- Bakun A

Volume 12, Issue 2
February 2022
Pages 365-388

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, University of Mazandaran

2 Marlik Higher Education Association

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, University of Mazandaran

Abstract
Abstract
The decoration of potteries was very important in prehistoric and before protoliterate periods. The structure and motives on the ceramics accommodate the possibility of the study about ancient human thoughts and demonstrate the dependence of his ideas and minds on the natural and social environments in which he has lived and grew up. Therefore, by examining these motives, one can study and analyze the mental, ideological, social and economic complexities of ancient societies. The authors have studied the organization of pottery production in an ancient society by researching the "grammar" of motives and aesthetic quality of prehistoric painted pottery. The culture of Tall-e-Bakun A which has prevailed in Marvdasht plain in Fars Province at the end of 5th and the beginning of 4th millennium BCE, is the case study of this investigation.

The ceramics have been produced in a standardized productive organization and a specialized process during Bakun A phase. Requirements and rules have been used in creating patterns on pottery of this period, the most important of which are: placing motifs in frames, symmetry, repetition, reversing and clockwise direction of motifs, creating motifs with negative technique and using separating elements. This study also has proved that the relationship between the designs and the forms of the potteries has been relative. The grammar and method of motives on jars, cups and bowls have shown that often the same patterns and models are used in their execution. The execution of them.

Keywords

Subjects
- پلاک، سوزان، ۱۳۸۰، ”سبک و اطلاع‌رسانی سفالینه‌های شوش“، مترجم کامیار عبدی، مجله باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ، تهران: نشر دانشگاهی، ش. ۱، (شماره پیاپی ۲۷): ۴۳- ۲۵.
- عابدی، نادره، ۱۳۸۲، ”یاداشتی بر سازمان تولید و پراکنش سفال“، دوفصلنامه باستان‌پژوهی، تهران، ش. ۱۱: ۳۲- ۲۱.
- هل، فرانک، ۱۳۸۰، ”تحلیل ساختار و نقوش سفال‌های پیش از تاریخ“، مترجم کامیار عبدی، مجله باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ، تهران: نشر دانشگاهی، ش. ۲، (شماره پیاپی ۲۸): ۳۷- ۲۲.
غیر فارسی:
- Adams, W. Y., 1979, “On the Argument from Ceramics to History: A Challenge Based on Evidence from Medieval Nubia”, Current Anthropology 20 (4): 727-744.
- Alizadeh, A., 2006, the Origins of State Organizations in Prehistoric Highland Fars, Southern Iran: Excavation at Tall- e Bakun, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Blackman, M. J., G. J. Stein & P. B. Vandiver, 1993, “The Standardization Hypothesis and Ceramic Mass Production: Technological, Compositional, and Metric Indexes of Craft Specialization at Tell Leilan, Syria”, American Antiquity 58 (1): 60-80.
- Balfet, H., 1965, “Ethnographic Observations in North Africa and Archaeological Interpretation: The Pottery of the Maghreb”, in F. R. Matson (ed.), Ceramic and Man, Aldine, Chicago.
- Bernbeck, R.; H. Fazeli Nashli & S. Pollock, 2005, “Life in a fifth millennium BCE village: Excavations at Rahmatabad, Iran,” Near Eastern Archaeology 68 (3): 94-105.
- Clark, J. E. & W. Parry, 1991, “Craft Specialization and Cultural Complexity”, Research in Economic Anthropology 12: 289-346.
- Connor, J. G. & W. L. Rathje, 1973, “Mass Production and the Ancient Maya: Experiments in Cracking Maya Pots”, Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Francisco.
- Costin, C. L., 1991, Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production, Archaeological Method and Theory, the University of Arizona Press.
- Cross, J. R., 1993, “Craft Specialization in Nonstratified Societies”, Research in Economic Anthropology 14: 61-84.
- Egami, N. & S. Masuda, 1962, Marv Dasht I, The Excavations at Tall-I Bakun, 1956, Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
- Hole, F., 1983, “Symbols of Religion and Social Organization at Susa”, in the Hilly Flanks and Beyond: Essays on the Prehistoric of Southwestern Asia presented to Robert J. Briadwood, Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 36: 315-333.
- Hole, F., 1984, “Analysis of Structure and Design in Prehistoric”, World Archaeology 13/3: 326-347.
- Langsdorff, A. & D. E. McCown, 1942, Tall-i Bakun A: Season of 1932, Oriental Institute Publications 59, Chicago Oriental Institute.
- Nicholson, P. T. & H. L. Pattersson, 1985, “Pottery making in Upper Egypt: an ethnoarchaeological study”, World Archaeology 17: 222-239.
- Potts, D. T. & K. Roustaei, 2006, The Mamassani Archaeological Project Stage One: A report on the first two seasons of the ICAR – University of Sydney Joint Expedition to the Mamasani District, Fars Province, Iran, Tehran: Iranian Center for Archaeological Research.
- Peacock, D. P. S., 1982, Pottery in the Roman World: an ethnoarchaeological approach, London: Longman.
- Pollock, S., 1983, “Style and Information: As Analysis of Susiana Ceramics”, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2: 354-390.
- Rice, P. M., 1987, Pottery Analysis: A Source Book, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Rathje, W., 1975, “The Last Tango in Mayapan: A Tentative Trajectory of Production Distribution System”, in J. A. Sabloff and C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (eds.), Ancient Civilization and Trade, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
- Stark, B. L. & J. T. Hepworth, 1982, “A Diversity Index Approach to Analysis of Standardization in prehistoric Pottery” Computer Applications in Archaeology 1982: Conference/ Proccedings, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England: 87-104.
- Van der Leeuw & E. Sander, 1977, “Towards a study of the economics of pottery making”, in Ex Horreo, B. L. Van Beek, R. W. Brandt and W. Groenman-van Waateringe (eds.), Amsterdam.
- Wobst, M., 1977, “Stylistic Behavior and Information Exchange”, in J. B. Griffin and C. Clealand (eds.), University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Paper 61: 317-342.