<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Tarbiat Modares University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>historical sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-1941</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Critical Reasoning on the Relation of Theory and Experimentation:Case Study: Epistemic Apparatuses of Positivism, Critical Rationalism and Fuzzy</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Critical Reasoning on the Relation of Theory and Experimentation:Case Study: Epistemic Apparatuses of Positivism, Critical Rationalism and Fuzzy</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>61</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>92</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">22784</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Saie</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University TarbiatModares Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
		<Abstract>The present article critically discusses about the relation of theory and experimentation.
This text is based on rational reasoning. The problem is that dominantmethodology on the relation oftheoryandexperimentationisbasedAristotelian logic in which experimentation has Context of Discovery or context of justification. In Iran, positivism and it’s relation with critical rationalism are misunderstood. 
This paper attempts to solve this kind of methodological issues through critical discussion. 
 First, we discussed about epistemic apparatuses of positivism and critical rationality. Then, after critical discussion about the two epistemic apparatuses, fuzzy methodology is formulated as result of criticism excised the intellectual traditions. In the end, positivism is discussed as a problem in Iran.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The present article critically discusses about the relation of theory and experimentation.
This text is based on rational reasoning. The problem is that dominantmethodology on the relation oftheoryandexperimentationisbasedAristotelian logic in which experimentation has Context of Discovery or context of justification. In Iran, positivism and it’s relation with critical rationalism are misunderstood. 
This paper attempts to solve this kind of methodological issues through critical discussion. 
 First, we discussed about epistemic apparatuses of positivism and critical rationality. Then, after critical discussion about the two epistemic apparatuses, fuzzy methodology is formulated as result of criticism excised the intellectual traditions. In the end, positivism is discussed as a problem in Iran.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Epistemic apparatus of critical rationality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Epistemic apparatus of positivism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Impressions and ideas</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Verification</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">falsifiability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Fuzzyepistemic apparatus</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jhs.modares.ac.ir/article_22784_21b49d9441391d620b8ececd6a402dc7.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
